Prediction of Verena Meliss [584th] vs Elizabeth Mandlik [237th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L L W W L
Form
L W L W W L L L L LH2H: Meliss 0 - 0 Mandlik
| Meliss | Stats | Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (6-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (11-8) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 584 | Ranking | 237 |
| 487 | Highest Rank | 97 |
| 27 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 8 |
| 48% (220-238) | Career Total W/L | 56% (175-139) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $314,025 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Verena Meliss vs Elizabeth Mandlik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Meliss 0 - 0 Mandlik
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Meliss has won 39.83% of points on their second serve, while Mandlik has won 39.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Meliss, in recent form, has won 49.4% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mandlik has won 55.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.31% and 34.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Meliss has saved 48.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mandlik has saved 46.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Meliss has won 53.57% of matches played (W/L 30/ 26), with Mandlik winning 50.82% (W/L 31/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Meliss has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 161/ 179). Mandlik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 101/ 69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 13% (W/L 1/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Meliss has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.75% of matches (W/L 14/ 18), where as Mandlik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.27% of matches (W/L 23/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Meliss has played against opponents with an average rank of 122.82 while Mandlik has played against players with an average rank of 235.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Meliss has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mandlik has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Meliss has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mandlik has converted 43.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Verena Meliss vs Elizabeth Mandlik Best Odds For The Match
Verena Meliss Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Verena Meliss
Player
Min Liu
61%
(
81 of
133)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
114)
0
Aces
6
10
Double Faults
0
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
59 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
114)
127
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Verena Meliss
50%
(
3 of
6)
1st Serve %
78%
(
7 of
9)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
2 of
3)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
10
Total Points Won
5
|
6-3 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Verena Meliss
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Verena Meliss
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Ezgi Cagil Ozcelik
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Verena Meliss
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve %
83%
(
5 of
6)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
16
Total Points Won
9
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Barbara Dessolis
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
45%
(
9 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
61%
(
22 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
39
Total Points Won
40
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nahia Berecoechea
Player
Verena Meliss
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
41%
(
46 of
111)
2
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
111)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Sofia Sanchez
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Alicia Herrero Linana
49%
(
47 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
66 of
94)
5
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
1
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
40%
(
19 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
94)
102
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Victoria Hu
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Aliona Bolsova
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
82%
(
72 of
88)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
44 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Meliss vs Mandlik?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Meliss Vs Mandlik is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48% (220/238) | Win/Loss | 56% (175/139) |
| 49% (515/532) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (400/332) |
| 50% (4821/4780) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3542/3186) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 705 | Aces Total | 506 |
| 0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.4 |
| 1619 | Total Double Faults | 1327 |
| 1:21:33 | Average Match Time | 1:31:55 |
| 203.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 269.17 |
| 63% (15358/24268) | 1st Serve % | 56% (11255/20204) |
| 61% (9361/15358) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (7012/11255) |
| 43% (3816/8910) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4008/8948) |
| 47% (1363/2898) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (1349/2595) |
| 45% (10773/23843) | Return Points Win % | 47% (9543/20093) |
| 48% (214/444) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (172/310) |
| 43% (3/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (55/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 35% (21/60) |
| 44% (58/131) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (55/108) |
| 81% (226/183) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (169/148) |
| 19% (226/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (169/21) |
| 16% (232/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (145/27) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
